Intolerance
The Times has been supporting David Cameron since the off, and its editorial in May makes interesting reading. Given it's now been five months, and there must have been corrections suggested, I'm wondering whether it actually did mean 'intolerant' here:
The successor must be able to articulate the need for tax cuts, and yet to appear intolerant on issues such as immigration.
Also, it's come to my attention that David Cameron was not an MP for most of April...